Background:
War zones present extreme challenges for healthcare delivery, with limited medical personnel, infrastructure destruction, and restricted patient mobility. Distant healthcare—utilizing telemedicine, AI-driven diagnostics, and remote consultations—offers innovative solutions to bridge healthcare gaps in these crisis settings.
Methods
This study explores the implementation of virtual healthcare in war zones, analyzing case studies from recent conflicts. Key approaches include telemedicine platforms connecting frontline responders with specialists, AI-assisted triage for efficient resource allocation, and mobile health applications for self-care guidance.
Results
Distant healthcare has demonstrated significant advantages, including rapid expert consultations, improved triage efficiency, and enhanced mental health support for affected populations. However, obstacles such as unstable internet connectivity, cybersecurity risks, cultural barriers, and legal constraints hinder its full potential.
Conclusion
While virtual healthcare is transforming medical response in war zones, addressing technological and logistical barriers is crucial. Strengthening digital infrastructure, ensuring data security, and integrating local healthcare providers are essential for sustainable implementation.
References
[1] Mowafi H. Conflict, displacement
2011;6(5):472–87. doi:10.1080/17441692.2011.570358.
[2] Kumar YS, Kamath JS.
frontlines of war: essential roles and responsibilities. Am
J Med Open. 2024;11:100064.
doi:10.1016/j.ajmo.2024.100064.
[3] Poberezhets V, Demchuk A, Mostovoy Y. How
Russian-Ukrainian war changed the usage of
telemedicine: a questionnaire
Ankara Med J. 2022;22(3):305
doi:10.5505/amj.2022.08455.
[4] Parkes P, Pillay TD, Bdaiwi Y, et al.
interventions in six conflict
WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic
review. Confl Health. 2022;16(1):64.
doi:10.1186/s13031-022-00493
[5] Bdaiwi Y, Sabouni A, Patel P, et al.
conflict on health professionals’ education and training in
Syria: a systematic review. BMJ Open.
2023;13(7):e064851. doi:10.1136/bmjo
064851.
[6] Novakivskyy V, Shurduk R, Grin I, et al.
Ukraine and dialysis treatment: human suffering and organizational challenges. Clin Kidney J.
2023;16(4):676–83. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfad003.
[7] Jefee-Bahloul H, Moustafa MK, Shebl FM, Bark
Oteo A. Pilot assessment and survey of Syrian refugees’
psychological stress and openness to referral for
telepsychiatry (PASSPORT Study). Telemed J E Health.
2014;20(10):977–9. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0373.
[8] Alajlani M, Clarke M. Effect of culture on
of telemedicine in Middle Eastern countries: case study
of Jordan and Syria. Telemed J E Health.
2013;19(4):305–11. doi:10.1089/tmj.2012.0106.
